Robinhood Stock Trading | Investing & Articles

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Robinhood review
    • Robinhood crypto
    • Robinhood gamestop
    • Robinhood stock price
  • Crypto
    • Binance
    • Bithumb
    • Coinbase
    • FTX
    • Huobi Global
  • Brokers
    • Charles Schwab
    • E*Trade
    • Fidelity
    • Interactive Brokers
  • Debt

Robinhood Stock Trading | Investing & Articles

Header Banner

Robinhood Stock Trading | Investing & Articles

  • Home
  • Robinhood review
    • Robinhood crypto
    • Robinhood gamestop
    • Robinhood stock price
  • Crypto
    • Binance
    • Bithumb
    • Coinbase
    • FTX
    • Huobi Global
  • Brokers
    • Charles Schwab
    • E*Trade
    • Fidelity
    • Interactive Brokers
  • Debt
Scottrade
Home›Scottrade›St. Louis Comptroller Extends Scottrade Center Funding Legal Battle | Metro

St. Louis Comptroller Extends Scottrade Center Funding Legal Battle | Metro

By Tim Kane
December 4, 2017
0
0

Moriarty said the law only provides for two methods of doing so, neither of which was used in this case.

Under the charter, the controller can refuse to sign a contract only if it is carried out “without the prior authorization of law or ordinance”. According to Moriarty, Green’s only other option to preserve the city’s credit is to secure emergency funding to pay off debts, judgments or other liabilities that the city may face.

The funding deal would cover the Scottrade Center renovations which will take place in three phases through 2019. The first phase, completed this summer, was funded by an unexpected debt contracted by the Blues after negotiations with Green failed, the lawyers said.

The city would pay off the debt, totaling $ 105 million with interest, over 30 years.

Another obstacle remains to have the financing agreement promulgated: a trial of Alderman Cara Spencer challenging its constitutionality, which is due to be tried in less than a week.

Moriarty is also the presiding judge in this trial in which Spencer and two other plaintiffs claim the deal was primarily for the Blues and amounts to an unconstitutional donation of public funds to a private entity. Lawyers for the city and the Blues retorted that there was a clear intention to promote economic development.

Related posts:

  1. Jim Gaffigan Makes the Crowd Laugh and Ultimately Hot Pockets at Scottrade Center | Arts and theater
  2. Protective order sought in Scottrade Center lawsuit | Metro
  3. Discover the new renovations of the Scottrade Center
  4. Arch Madness to stay at Scottrade until 2020
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy